|
We are beginning a discussion of the possibility of multi-year IPDPs. This information will guide our discussion at the October, 2010 LPDC meetings.
| |
1
|
| I am an LPDC member |
| I am an Administrator |
| I represent an Elementary school |
| I represent a Secondary school |
| |
Please rate the following 4 statements in terms of importance:
| |
2
|
Yearly IPDPs help educators be aware of renewal dates and progress toward licensure requirements. How important is this?
| Not Important | Somewhat Important | Important | Very Important |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
| |
3
|
Yearly IPDPs allow educators to change professional development focus goals during the 5-year cycle. How important is this?
| Not Important | Somewhat Important | Important | Very Important |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
| |
4
|
Yearly IPDPs allow for flexibility with the school's OCSAA goals/timeline. How important is this?
| Not Important | Somewhat Important | Important | Very Important |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
| |
5
|
The yearly IPDP process is understood by educators and the process is working. How important is this?
| Not Important | Somewhat Important | Important | Very Important |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
| |
6
|
Writing IPDPs on a 2-year cycle was proposed. What are the benefits?
| |
7
|
What are the drawbacks of writing IPDPs on a 2-year cycle?
| |
8
|
Would you be in favor of further discussion of 2-year IPDPs?
| |
9
|
Writing IPDPs on a 5-year cycle was proposed with yearly checks for completion of professional development. What are the benefits?
| |
10
|
What are the drawbacks of writing IPDPs on a 5-year cycle?
| |
11
|
Would you be in favor of further discussion of 5-year IPDPs?
| |
12
|
Is the IPDP used at your school as data for contract discussions?
| |
13
|
Yearly IPDPs are repetitive and lessen the impact of the IPDP. Do you agree?
| |
|
|