|
Questions marked with an asterisk (*) are mandatory.
2
|
Methods for evaluation: Questionnaire and interview guide for assessing employer reaction, satisfaction, and planned action Evaluation Components: Appropriateness of the Toolkit - Assessing the employer's reaction to the content
1
Disagree Strongly | 2
Disagree | 3
Indifferent | 4
Agree | 5
Strongly Agree |
| a. The Toolkit addresses a health topic that is important to our organization. |
|
|
|
|
|
| b. The Toolkit includes sufficient information to understand the problem of cardiovascular disease. |
|
|
|
|
|
| c. The Toolkit includes sufficient information to help me develop an actionable solution that is appropriate for our organization. |
|
|
|
|
|
| d. The Toolkit is presented in a clear and organized manner. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
3
|
The targeted priorities of the Toolkit are aligned with the overall health priorities of our organization: (rate each individually)
1
Disagree Strongly | 2
Disagree | 3
Indifferent | 4
Agree | 5
Strongly Agree |
| a. Improve blood pressure levels |
|
|
|
|
|
| b. Improve cholesterol levels |
|
|
|
|
|
| c. Increase knowledge of signs/symptoms for heart attack and stroke |
|
|
|
|
|
| d. Improve emergency response |
|
|
|
|
|
| e. Alter benefit design to change behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
4
|
Effectiveness of the Toolkit - Assessing the employer's satisfaction with content meaningfulness
1
Disagree Strongly | 2
Disagree | 3
Indifferent | 4
Agree | 5
Strongly Agree |
| a. The Toolkit describes important data needed to estimate the number of employees who have cardiovascular disease and provides instructions about how to obtain the data. |
|
|
|
|
|
| b. The Toolkit includes an easy-to-use formula to calculate the current costs of cardiovascular disease in an employee population (step 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
| c. The Toolkit describes an easy method for estimating the potential cost savings of cardiovascular disease if active engagement around awareness, education, and support occurs (step 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
| d. The Toolkit includes employer case studies that are realistic and impactful. (step 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
| e. The Toolkit provides a set of helpful guidelines for creating a worksite program that adresses HDSP (step 4) |
|
|
|
|
|
| f. The Toolkit shows effective ways to engage health plan partners in addressing heart disease and stroke prevention at the worksite (step 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
| g. The Toolkit provides a set of useful resources and materials for additional information about establishing partnerships for heart disease and stroke prevention (step 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
5
|
Usage of the Toolkit - Assessing the employer's resulting action
1
Not Enacted | 2
In Discussion Stage | 3
In Planning Stage | 4
In Implementation/Action Stage | 5
Already Enacted |
| a. Our leadership of management supports efforts to improve heart disease and prevent stroke as a result of the Toolkit. |
|
|
|
|
|
| b. We decided to address heart disease and stroke prevention because we collected the data and calculated the potential savings for our population. |
|
|
|
|
|
| c. We launched a heart disease and stroke prevention worksite program similar to the employer case studies in the Toolkit. |
|
|
|
|
|
| d. We contacted our health plan to participate as a partner in data collection, assessment, and/or worksite implementation efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
| e. We modified our communications to employees to increase awareness and education about heart disease and stroke prevention. |
|
|
|
|
|
| f. We modified our plan design to include disease management, coaching, and/or benefit design to help employees control blood pressure and control cholesterol as part of heart disease and stroke prevention efforts. |
|
|
|
|
|
| g. We included a heart disease and stroke prevention worksite program as part of our health and wellness strategy for next year as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|